Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Opposable Thumbs? Really?

According to the usually-legitimate source, Wikipedia, Homo habilis was benefiting from opposable thumbs one million years ago. The perks of opposable thumbs initially involved the capacity for fine motor skills, which resulted in the ability to develop and use tools. So--whatever--it's a big deal and one that I don't often consider as part of my primate identity. Until today, and I'm having an identity crisis.

When I have a lot of work to do, I make sure that Koven gets some good running/training/river time before settling in. I also try to offer him some engaging stuff to do, should he wish to do some "stuff." With the generous gift from Koven's Uncle Bryce, we selected some new toys and treats, including a new treat dispensing toy, since he's mastered excavation of the stuffed Kong.

The rationale for selecting the treat dispensing toy was to amuse Koven and in so doing allow me some sustained and focused work time. However, watching Koven problem solve this new puzzle was quite absorbing. After getting the "easy" treats, he struggled with how to get the larger ones. I want this game to be far more reinforcing than frustrating, and so eventually I stepped in. An hour and ten minutes later, with supposed advantages from opposable thumbs and the use of multiple tools, the larger treats were dislodged. My natural conclusion is that I don't have much up on Koven.

Opposable thumbs also "ensured that important human functions such as writing were possible." Hmmm. Maybe I should try that.

No comments:

Post a Comment